Pioneer Press Endorses Harris

On Sunday, the Capitol City’s daily newspaper swung its support to former City Council member (Ward Three) Pat Harris (DFL). The paper noted his depth of experience and commitment to the community of St Paul. The ringing endorsement said, “Our endorsement goes to former City Council Member Pat Harris, whose background in both the public and private sectors — a dozen years on the city council and more than 15 as a public-finance professional — equips him distinctly to meet the challenges of a changing city.”

Read the endorsement in its entirety.

St Paul Mayoral Race 2017 Continued

The most interesting development in the St Paul mayoral race this week was the release of former City Council member (Ward Three) Pat Harris’ (DFL) “Safe St Paul” plan for increasing police by 50 FTEs during his four years in office. The cost of such a program would be about $7.5 million and there’s not any direction on where that would come out of the budget. When it was released on Monday, the other candidates questioned the reason for the proposal and where the money would come from.

This proposal reinforces the perception of Harris being the more conservative candidate. A law and order appeal strikes a chord with older and more conservative voters. As we have scrutinized the support base of the Harris campaign we can see direct support from many prominent Republican contributors.

Harris has received financial support from 2014 Republican candidate for U.S. Senate Mike McFadden, Minneapolis Police Union President Bob Kroll, which was later returned and Republican spokesperson for Governor Tim Pawlenty Brian McClung, Republican political operatives Mike ZIpko, Carl Kuhl, Patrick Connolly and former Republican legislator now lobbyist Joel Carlson.

If the strategy of the Harris campaign is to cultivate the voters on the right and there may not be enough votes on that side of the formula to win the day. The only two candidates appealing to the right are Harris and Tim Holden (R). Since the winnowing of the field will take place during the tabulations of RCV Harris may be in the uncomfortable position of holding the conservative spot but not generating many second-choice votes. Because if candidates drop as we anticipate then Holden votes move to Harris but Holden only carried 4978 votes in 2013 against Mayor Chris Coleman (DFL) and we expect a lower percentage this election. If the universe of voters is less than 45,000, as we believe, the bump Harris gets will be no more than 10 or 11%.

While, on the left side of the formula are former City Council Member Melvin Carter III (DFL), Elizabeth Dickinson (GR), current Council member (Ward one) Dai Thao (DFL), and Tom Goldstein (DFL).

When Goldstein‘s votes are reallocated, we doubt they will go to Harris. There is a possibility of some of the Thao votes, especially members of the Hmong Chamber of Commerce may move to Harris, but the big question is how large is that block of votes. We are quite assured when Dickinson’s votes are re-distributed we are highly doubtful those votes will land with Harris.
So while Harris has consolidated his base, in a system where base plus voting seems to be the rule, he may not have many opportunities for second choice votes to move in his direction.

AFSCME Support for Carter May Be Desperate Move for Coleman

Supporters of gubernatorial candidate St Paul Mayor Chris Coleman are visibly helping former City Council Member Melvin Carter III (DFL) in his bid to replace Coleman. It is thought the reason for the support is intended to ingratiate Coleman with AFSCME and hopefully secure their endorsement in the Governor’s race.

If the ploy works then Coleman could bolster his flagging campaign. Right now, all indicators are pointing to Congressman Tim Walz (D-MN01) as the front-runner.

St Paul Positioned to Have the Most Transparent Election in State History

There is one benefit of the Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) system and that is the improved quality of voting machines purchased by Ramsey County in 2015. These new machines will be taking a picture of every ballot cast in the St Paul elections and later will be made available to the public on the Ramsey County website.

This means we will finally know how everyone in St Paul voted and we will see if voters used the RCV system correctly, or if the participated in casting multiple ballots at all. Anecdotally, only about 30% of the electorate casts more than one ballot.

Dickinson Goes Old School

St Paul Mayoral candidate Elizabeth Dickinson (GR) has resurrected an old campaign mechanism. She may have gotten the idea from the old campaigner Roy Magnuson. They are calling the piece the “Dickinson Dispatch” in it are a series of articles intended to introduce Dickinson to the voters of St Paul. They are literature dropping 50,000 pieces from now until the end of the campaign.

Dickinson Dispatch

Update on the St Paul Mayoral Election 2017

Voters in St Paul are receiving additional information in the St Paul Mayoral race from an Independent Expenditure group called Building a Better St Paul. Since the Supreme Court ruling on Citizen’s United v. FEC (2010) political campaigns have been supported and opposed by outside campaign groups.

Former Rep. Brian Bergson (DFL-Champlin) who has lived in St Paul for over 20 years, is listed as the Chair and Secretary/Treasurer. The campaign has raised a good deal of money. In its 8-week pre-election the political committee reports receiving $53,600.00, spent $42.652.31 and has a balance of $10,652.32.

So far, the Building a Better St Paul committee has mailed out four literature pieces with favorable information supporting former City Council Member (Ward One) Pat Harris. (DFL). Because this is an independent group it is prohibited from coordinating with the Harris Campaign, but the themes and tenor of the messages highlight attributes the Harris campaign advances itself.

The larger campaign contributions are:

St Paul Police Foundation                           $10,000.00

St Paul Chamber of Commerce                  $10,000.00

Teamsters Local 120                                     $10,000.00

St Paul Police Federation                             $10,000.00

Stephanie Laitala (Minneapolis Resident) $5,000.00

We are expecting the more negative, targeted efforts to differentiate Harris from the field of nine other candidates will occur are the last campaign finance report is filed on October 24th.

Here is a link to the full report.

Stay tuned.

St Paul Voters Are Not Being Served Well This Election

We have been strong in our criticism of Ranked Choice Voting, and our experience in the way voters are being informed this election is a prime example of the problems with the system. Saint Paul voters are left with little information other than candidates literature when making their determinations for the next mayor in November.

The main reasons because of a large number of candidates (10), and the structure of the forums based on standards from the League of Women Voters (LWV). The LWV in its attempt to be fair and impartial does a serious disservice to the voters.  By incorporating all the candidate’s voices, is laudable as a goal, practically it does not provide the citizenry a good quality understanding of the positions of the various candidates. We have attended two separate events one at the Mount Zion Temple and the Halle Q Brown Center during the last week and came away with the same conclusion. There are too many people to hear from.

The LWV produced a 2017 Saint Paul Voter Guide, but it only exists as a handout and is not available on their website.

We understand, there will be other forums that will be structured in a “Speed Dating” format where the candidates will move from one table to the next engaging with the participants. Sorry, but selecting a mayor is not like looking for a date, that is a trite pursuit and the affairs of the Capitol City warrant far more consideration than a novelty.

Prior to attending these forums, we expected them to distinctively different, because of the locations of the discussion, but sadly they were similar. We came hoping for a robust conversation about the major issue facing the city and received less than a Cliff notes version of any one candidate’s thoughts.

At Mount Zion Temple, the audience mainly consisted of middle-aged to elderly Caucasians with a spattering of younger people most involved with one or another campaign. We were not surprised when the only four persons of color were the three candidates former City Council Member Ward 0ne Melvin Carter III (DFL), City Council Member Ward 0ne Dai Thao (DFL), Trahern Crews and one Hispanic gentleman providing technical support.

We anticipated this event to be more of a conservative affair because of the nature of the sponsors Summit Hill Neighborhood Association and the Grand Avenue Chamber of Commerce. 9 of the 10 candidates were present except for Chris Holbrook and perennial gadfly candidate Sharon Anderson arrived late.

Each event was the same the candidates were given a short one-minute response to questions asked by the moderator and the moderator started with a different person each time based on LWV rules. The result was no in-depth discussion about any topic but just a cursory statement made by each of the candidates.

The problem is other than comedic value certain candidates being on the stage provided more of a distraction instead of useful information. Each time Anderson spoke it resulted in either laughter or groans. Again, if there were a primary that had taken place prior to this time the field would we be without it down to two candidates and the voters of Saint Paul would have an opportunity to understand the differences between the two candidates and whom they thought best capable representing the city.

As we have previously discussed, we have broken the field of candidates into 3 tiers and will only discuss issue of substance from thought people. We will not waste your time discussing others.

On Tuesday night, at Mount Zion Temple, the candidates provided their standard stump speech which we’ve have heard throughout the summer. Former City Council Member (Ward One) Melvin Carter III (DFL) discussed his being a fourth-generation St Paulite whose grandfather was a janitor in St. Paul public schools and he’s a product of the Rondo neighborhood.

Tim Holden (I) criticized the mayor and the City Council for pushing through issues without citizen support.

Former City Council Member (Ward Three) Pat Harris (DFL) stated he is also a fourth-generation St Paulite emphasizing that he is been working all his public life to make the city better by creating a library committee which resulted in the Rondo library and the Arlington Heights library. He’s a public finance professional with a bold jobs program.

Former School Board Member Tom Goldstein (DFL) discussed the need for improvements and infrastructure affordable housing pre-kindergarten education rec centers libraries and parks focusing on job-creating not subsidizing stadiums and other nonessential building projects as priorities.

Current, City Council Member (Ward One) Dai Thao (DFL) due to his late arrive was given an opportunity to state his opening remarks and said, he’s a short Asian liberal IT professional who has the clout to succeed and keep meters off of Grand Avenue not supporting the Ford site because he respects the people who live there.

Elizabeth Dickinson (GR) quickly stated she’s the Green party candidate with experience working with the Minnesota aids project and that the main difference she has from the guys is that she’s running to bring green jobs to Saint Paul.

In the limited amount of time, they covered some cursory issues including:

$15 minimum wage.

Dickinson was in support feeling that property is disproportionate amongst people of color and it does not put businesses out of business

Harris also supports a $15 minimum wage stating that he supported it as a member of the Metropolitan Airport Commission when they were pushing for a $15 minimum wage for baggage handlers. He wants to protect against job loss inflation in managing taxes and regulation.

Thao didn’t answer the question, he waffled. He says he wants to invite businesses to the table but seems to have changed his opinion on the minimum wage which as we understand has been a point of contention between him and the mung Chamber of Commerce.

Carter emphasized being the first candidate to have stated his favorable position for the $15 minimum wage. He believes it’s an investment in creating a stable family and neighborhood and providing better opportunities for education.

Holden supports it in a patchwork fashion for certain businesses that can afford it agrees that it will fix the party problem and promote additiona commerce, but discussed the fact that some businesses cannot handle a $15 minimum wage.

Goldstein supports the effort to get everyone to a $15 minimum wage your plugs targets movement towards a $15 minimum wage but also believes that a $15 minimum wage is not adequate unless you also have a healthcare system in place.

Racial Equity

Holden believes it’s all about respect and that people need to listen to one another.

Goldstein sees it as an opportunity if you don’t have housing and jobs in low-income neighborhoods everything should be like Highland Park. He believes that solar jobs are one of the answers.

Harris also sees it as an opportunity started to discuss his bald jobs program with access to capital in Summit University and on the east side of St. Paul targeting schools with more dollars in the classroom and I focus on jobs-education housing.

Carter wants to eliminate racial discrimination and it’s all involved in the same goals which are to improve education and jobs.

Thao stressed the fact that he is an example of somebody who has experienced racial inequities as an immigrant coming to this country as a child and living in subsidized housing.

Dickinson supports in hiring 40% people of color for city jobs and supports the forthcoming Bigelow foundation recommendations.

During one moment in the forum a question was asked about the Amazon contest for various cities to come forward with proposals to encourage the siting of the second corporate headquarters. As a device, they suggested that Amazon President Jeff Bezos was in the audience and what would you say to him.

Thao missed the question altogether Holden talked about how if we could bring Amazon here it might help fill the downtown.

Goldstein remarked flippantly asking “are you lost” and then went on to saying that the Ford plant site would have been a great distribution spot not Shakopee and stressed the need to negotiate across the table.

Harris said that he would stress education the private colleges and university of Minnesota in addition to transit and then also discussed the Ford site and then said well you could stop over to my house will have some food and make some things happen.

Carter said we should look at all other cities and compare are we looking for a 21st-century transportation system navigation system of our schools and our colleges and in comparison Saint Paul comes out on top.

Spending Cuts

Carter stressed that the budget is a values document and we should focus on expanding our cities opportunities.

Harris discussed efficiencies general fund financing Public Safety and restructuring the cities’ debt. Recommending that you run the city like a business.

Goldstein called for the hiring of an independent city auditor and how the city could save $21 million if it weren’t for obligations based on tax increment financing.

Dickinson agreed with Harris regarding restructuring the debt. She also agreed with Goldstein on the tax increment financing issues and called for a freezing of senior’s property taxes where their obligation would be for filled after they leave their home. Meaning creating a specific debt that is tied to that property from his past residents.

Holden said that there are 12 departments they need to be looked at and there needs to be a financial audit.

Thao stressed his work in IT. Believes that through data analysis of cell phone records computer logs and other mechanisms that efficiency and accountability can be established so that we would know which employees are looking at Facebook on city computers. He supports the PILOT program or PILT (payment in lieu of taxes) to meet funding and calls for a public audit.

On Schools

Harris calls for more money to the schools immediately. Stressing that he has a program that will bring money into the school, but due to lack of time had no ability to impart that knowledge to the audience.

Carter highlights his role in the creation of Saint Paul promise neighborhood when he was a City Council member. Calls for more money for early childhood education, after-school and summer programs. Additionally, he would like to have a jobs program for students and employers with labor unions.

Goldstein stressed the fact that he’s the only one running for mayor who has been a school board member. He called on people in the room not to demonize schools. He called for a citywide commitment to education by establishing a strong higher education tie as is in place with Hamline University.

Dickinson pointed out that she’s the only one who is been a public-school teacher.

Thao discussed test scores have fallen for the last five years and that the curriculum needs to reflect the values of the community. He also called for all day pre-K.

Holden discussed the fact that the main issue in public schools is safety.

In each of their closing statements day again highlighted the same points that they did in their opening and there wasn’t much new information communicated.

On Wednesday at the Halle Q Brown Center. The evening started without Thao in attendance because he was in a council meeting about the Ford plant

.As we surveyed the audience in the highest minority district in the city only a 1/3 of the people by our account, were persons of color.

Once again, the openings were the same as we’d seen the day before the questions opened with the issue of racial disparities.

Carter emphasized Minnesota leads the nation in racial disparities.

Dickinson said that her program for solar on schools would help hire people and minority communities for solar installation jobs.

Harris emphasized jobs and education and fixing racial disparities based on a shift in the investment portfolio of the city.

On Schools

Carter again discussed his role in the creation of the St. Paul promise neighborhood.

Dickinson again pointed out she’s a former schoolteacher and called for an education based on restorative justice.

Goldstein stressed the need for partnerships between higher education systems and the schools.

Upon his arrival, Thao talked about the education gap and it’s connected to an economic gap in the need for role modeling of teachers that look like the community they are teaching.

On Public Safety

Dickinson discussed being on it a couple of ride-alongs emphasizing the only 2/10 of 1% of requiring the use of force.

Goldstein was critical of the fact the only 16% of the police force lives in St. Paul. And discussed incentives that could be used to encourage cops to live in the community they police.

Harris called for better training for the police force and that they should reflect the communities they police. He said that police need to be out in the neighborhood for community events not just for law-enforcement.

Thao discussed his role in helping remove the two officers off the civilian review board. And stated his support for the use of body cams.

Carter said as a son of a police officer he understands law enforcement. And said that when he turned 16 years old and began to drive he met a whole lot more police officers.

He called for hiring people that reflect their communities. An easier method for filing complaints. The need for crisis counselors. And a change in the use of force policy.

Biking and walking paths

Dickinson supports the bike plan and Grand Rounds. She said that we need to respect small businesses and provide support responses when there’s a lot of parking.

Goldstein believes that there should be a effort to build consensus on biking and proposed any need for a more commonsense solution.

Harris supports complete streets and walkable city is a livable city in a breakable city is a livable city.

Thao supports the bike plan and got a great laugh when you said I look funny on a bicycle because I can’t reach the pedals. He is an advocate for the stop for me campaign.

Carter discussed the need to discuss a sample of where we would like to be versus where we used to be an identified biking is an issue but it should not be a conflict between bikes versus cars and that we should seek the type of St. Paul that we want to live in.

Though this article may seem long there truly isn’t much information that differentiates one candidate from the others, except our tiered structure.

Thao Clear of Bribery Charges

Ward One City Council Member and mayoral candidate Dai Thao (DFL) has had the dark cloud removed from his campaign. Yesterday, he was cleared, as we have expected all along, of the allegations of soliciting a bribe, by the Scott County Prosecutor’s office.  Deputy Chief Attorney Neil Nelson said, “After analyzing the facts and applicable law, we believe there is insufficient information on which to prosecute,” in his letter to the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension.

Scott County also did the same for Thao former campaign manager Angela Marlowe.

Now, we expect things will get interesting in the mayoral campaign because the Thao campaign has been silently blaming the Carter campaign for the release of the information to Fox 9 investigative reporter Tom Lyden.   

St Paul Campaign Finance Reports 2017

The campaign finance reports for the St Paul Mayoral race were due today at 12:00 pm. As of this report, we are posting the information available from the Ramsey County Election’s website. We were on-hand at the office right before it closed and this is the only information available at this moment.

Both former City Council member (Ward Three) Pat Harris campaign and the former City Council member (Ward One) Melvin Carter III raised over $200K. Harris raised $286,957.55, spent $168,310.73 and has $119,296.82 on hand.  Carter raised $264,643.06, spent $212,000.09 and has $52,642.97 on hand.

One interesting feature of the Harris report is the lack of due diligence. In many instances, there is obvious information lacking from contributors. Many times, the report fails to list the occupation of the contributor and instead says “Best Efforts.” Now it seems someone on the campaign should know the occupation of Mike Harris, brother of candidate Harris and not list Best Efforts. Also, anyone in St Paul knows Bruce Larsen “the Kaiser” now deceased, who was written up in the Pioneer Press as the owner of Equity Services of St Paul.    Additionally, the second contribution from former Council Member Dave Thune should have the same information as the first contribution and not list Best Efforts. Joel Carlson is a Lobbyist and a quick Google search will bring up his Campaign Finance registration, they do have the number, it’s clear he is self-employed, but if it is hard to figure out there is a phone number to call. This It is just sloppy work.

We have listed the amounts available for the top two candidate tiers. We will update the list as information becomes available.

 Melvin Carter III

Contributions 8-week report       $112,273.06

Expenditures                                  $194,528.54


Contributions totals to date         $264,643.06

Expenditures                                  $212,000.09

Account balance                              $52,642.97


Elizabeth Dickinson

Contributions 8-week report           $9,899.96

Expenditures                                      $7,608.63


Contributions totals to date           $12,813.96

Expenditures                                    $14,653.02

Account balance                                $7,668.76


Tom Goldstein

Contributions 8-week report       $13,065.40

Expenditures                                  $13,041.72


Contributions totals to date        $19,953,93

Expenditures                                  $14,994.52

Account balance                               $4559,91


Pat Harris

Contributions 8-week report   $233,057.55

Expenditures                              $167,802.95


Contributions totals to date    $286,957.55

Expenditures                             $168,310.73

Account balance                        $119,296.82


Dai Thao                                       

Contributions 8-week report    $142,596.78

Expenditures                                 $71,219.67


Contributions totals to date     $171,541.77

Expenditures                                $74,079.10

Account balance                          $97,462.67


Tim Holden                               (Report Unavailable)    

Contributions 8-week report   ???

Expenditures                              ???


Contributions totals to date        ???

Expenditures                                  ???

Account balance                            ???

A Supreme Decision

If the State Supreme Court decides to support Governor Mark Dayton (DFL) in his powers as prescribed in the Minnesota Constitution, they will be acting as strict constructionists. If they side with the legislature they will be acting as judicial activists. The language of the state constitution is clear the Governor can line-item-veto any legislative expenditure.

Additionally, the state legislature impinges itself by sending the governor a budget, with the funding for the legislative branch included. In Washington, DC, the Congress sends the President a Budget Resolution, which he is not able to act upon, but is informed by. If the legislature were to do the same then the House and Senate would be funded as it is spelled out in the state Constitution.

This means the House drafts its resolution and the Senate drafts its own. Then the Governor is not able to take any action against legislative funding. Additionally, the Legislature could be vindictive and not budget any money for the various departments, commissions or boards overseen by the governor. Since the governor doesn’t have the ability to appropriate money then only his salary would be funded.

Of course, the legislature could pass a constitutional amendment and change the appropriations process if it were to pass in a plebiscite, which the governor lacks any role in.

If the Court is concerned about judicial independence they too should petition the legislature for a budget resolution, but then the judiciary would be solely dependent on the legislature for funding.

We will watch this issue closely to see if the judiciary is acting in the state’s interest or in self-preservation mode.

Minneapolis & St Paul Mayoral Races are Only Smiles and Profiles.

The problem with Ranked Choice Voting is the lack of differentiation between the candidates. The fact each candidate is seeking to be the 2nd choice for voters, after their 1st choice is no longer in the field, is only available if the voter selected someone who fails to finish first or second. This means the people who pick less able candidate with their first choice, show a lack of judgement and they get another shot at making a better choice with their second, third or in the case of St Paul up to sixth choice.

This exercise is a social experiment and not a system where the collective will of the electorate is easily obtained. Sure, voters may see the system as simple to use, who has problems filling in a blank oval on a ballot, and doing so more than once, but the problem is it doesn’t require voters to be discerning and make a solitary choice as to who they want to lead.

Politics is not a participation sport where everyone gets a medal for playing, it is not a beer tasting competition where collectively beer of the day is selected and given a trophy, it is far more important than this form of a trite exercise.

In St Paul, the State Supreme Court ruled against the collection of Right-of-Way fees intended to pay for infrastructure costs such as street maintenance. This caused a significant gap in the city’s funding sources. Now, the Citizen’s League is set to promote the idea of PILOT funding (Payment in Lieu of Taxes) again a term known in the State Tax Committees as PILT Funding, but it will not affect the 2018 budget.

There are significant issues to address in both Minneapolis and St Paul. The number of shootings by police, and between citizen’s needs to be addressed. The role of law enforcement and cops getting out of their cars is always a good idea, and in the case of Minneapolis, Mayoral candidate and Ward 3 City Council member Jacob Frey (DFL) has a worthy idea when he is interested in incentives to get cops to live in the city they work for are admirable. Again, the State Supreme Court ruled against the interests of city residents when they found this idea to be unconstitutional.

The campaign activities in both communities has been nearly non-existent. Now that the State Fair has ended the campaigns will start in earnest. The campaign finance reports in St Paul are due on September 12th and we will see who leads in the “Money Primary.”

There are nice smiley photographs in neighborhood newspapers, with a couple of paragraphs about each candidate and the most signs we have seen are expressing pro/con positions on the Ford Plant Redevelopment Plan.

This is a sleeper election to date unless something breaks to stir things up.

We are wondering if the BCA will make its report on Mayoral Candidate and Ward 1 City Council Member Dai Thao (DFL) extortion charges before the Election Day on November 7th? If not Thao campaign may feel the same impact as the Hillary Clinton (D) campaign did from FBI Director James Comey. Since Angela Marlowe was cleared of any wrong-doing one would expect the same for Thao.

The various third-party organizations have selected their candidates and we expect the volume of “negative” claims will come from that direction.

The Final Passage of Rick Stafford

We learned of the passage of Rick Stafford as many of us now do, on Facebook. The man who was small in stature had a significant impact on party politics both here in Minnesota DFL and at the DNC. He was the first openly gay DFL Party Chair, DNC National Committeeman, and was the chair of the DNC LGBT Caucus.

Stafford was not a single-issue voter, he supported a range of issues, with the primary focus on what was best for the DFL Party. His enduring nature was fighting the hard fight, but still, maintaining a relationship with his opponent, and then going to have a cigarette. Many people will be sad when they delete his number from their cell phone.

He has been instrumental in drafting the National Delegate Selection Plan for our state for the last 30 plus years and was an expert on parliamentary procedure and DFL Party Rules. To quote Stafford “Those who write the rules, Rule.”

A memorial is scheduled for Saturday at the Sabathani Community Center at 1 pm, 310 E 38th St, Minneapolis with a reception to follow in the gym.

Feehan Our Own Ossoff

When Dan Feehan announced his candidacy for the 1st Congressional District people scratched their proverbial heads and wondered who he was. He says he left the state when he was 14 years old, but now has returned and is calling the state home.

This is curious especially if you follow his own words.

Dan says, “I hail from Milwaukee, Wisconsin, the finest state in the union…During my freshman year at Georgetown University, I chased women and refused to cut my hair.”

Feehan also said in a speech given to Marmion Prep School that he married his wife and baptized one of his sons there, making it a home.

As people are looking for a candidate to replace Congressman Tim Walz (D-MN1) they will be looking for someone with integrity. If we again pay attention to what is known we find Dan says he joined the military because of 9/11… but he went to a prep academy in Chicago where he joined Junior ROTC in the late ‘90s.

Dan talks about Teach for America in Indiana… but he doesn’t talk about returning to Chicago to teach or about what he did for Rahm Emanuel’s administration.

Dan talks about losing his job because of Trump… but doesn’t mention and denies being recruited by the DCCC to move to Minnesota and run for Congress.

Now, one thing is clear non-Minnesotan’s have run for office after coming here for college, or having lived in the community they seek to represent after a significant period. US Senator Paul Wellstone (D) and Governor Arne Carlson (R) are the first two which come to mind, but each had some grounding here.

One fact Jon Ossoff faced which he couldn’t shake was the fact his opponent Sharon Handel could don a sticker which said, “I Voted” after she had voted for herself, and he could not.

If Feehan stays here after the election then he will prove he really wants to be a Minnesotan.

State Fair Polls

Usually, we publish the questions available at the state legislative fair booths in the Education Building. We will attest this is the 2nd time we failed. It was due to a great lack of motivation. But we still contend the questions asked are a flavor of what to expect in the forthcoming legislative session.

Since this will be the first time since the survey’s inception, both Republicans control both bodies in the legislature you can see from the questions asked which direction things will be heading. We expect another tumultuous session, where Governor Mark Dayton (DFL) will be expected to protect the state from an influx of Republicanism.

House Poll

Senate Poll

St Paul’s Development Situation

There are many opportunities for St Paul to change its landscape. The two largest are the St Paul Ford Plant and the Hillcrest Golf Course. With the 135 acres in Highland Park and the 110 acres on the east side, many families could become St Paul residents. The City is already on a pace to increase its population by 5% and will help the state increase its odds of retaining a Congressional District.

The closure of Cooper’s Grocery Store in Sibley Plaza also creates an additional opportunity. The revitalization of these different areas of the city can pour more lifeblood into the Capitol City and bolster the argument that St Paul is a better place to live than in Minneapolis.

Though we would truly lament the loss of Hillcrest Golf Course, but the times they are a changing.

Support for the Mayor’s Budget

When St Paul Mayor Chris Coleman (DFL) announced his proposed budget, many were quick to write the epitaph for his Gubernatorial campaign. The 23.9% property tax increase is a response to the State Supreme Court action on the collection of Right-of-Way fees. This accounts for a 14.86% hole in the proposed $141.3 million tax levy increase up from $113.9 million in 2017.

This is a tough position for the St Paul City Council. We expect the vote will pass with a bare margin. We doubt Mayoral Candidate and Ward 1 City Council Member Dai Thao (DFL) will support the Mayor’s position, but think the majority in support will be Ward Two Council Member Rebecca Noecker, Council President and Ward Four City Council Member Russ Stark (DFL), Ward Five City Council Member Amy Brendmoen, and Ward Seven City Council Member Jane Prince (DFL).


St Paul Mayor’s Race 2017: 82 Days and Counting

We posted a piece yesterday, which preempted other news sources. We discussed the occurrence of a robbery at the home of former City Council Member (Ward 1) Melvin Carter III (DFL). Due to expediency, we were not as detailed as other reports, but we were first to identify two of the items stolen as handguns, equipped with trigger locks, and secured in a lockbox.

This piece of information was not readily available in the initial police report released to the public, but was communicated to higher-ups in the department. Our source(s) were a bit quick on the trigger themselves and sought to portray a slightly different picture. Now as the air clears, we understand better the timing of the crime, the items taken and feeling created when one is violated in such a manner.

Since this is an active investigation, law enforcement is trying to prevent information from leaking out about specifics so that they can catch the criminal. We understand things are rapidly moving forward, and the authorities are confident about the ultimate result.

We apologize if we created any negative impression of Carter as being irresponsible or placing his family in any harmful situation. Since he grew up in the home of a police officer Carter, we have learned clearly, he has developed respect for firearms.

Filings Closure

The field of candidates in St Paul is now clearly defined at ten.  As we often do in large filing for office we will define these people into tiers. The first tier contains those we consider as legitimate viable candidates. In Tier One are: Carter, former City Council Member (Ward 3) Pat Harris (DFL), current City Council Member (Ward 1) Dai Thao (DFL), and Elizabeth Dickinson (Gr). In Tier Two are: Tom Goldstein (DFL), Tim Holden (I). In Tier Three are: Sharon Anderson, Trahern Crews, Chris Holbrook (L), Barnabas Joshua Yshua.

 In our estimation, only a Tier One candidate has the possibility of winning. The question will be who finishes in first or second place and can the candidates in third or fourth receive enough votes to leap past the top two?

This is where the voters for the Tier Two and Tier Three candidate may, and we stress may have an impact. The Tier Three candidates will likely receive less than 10% of the vote. In 2013, Anderson, a gadfly candidate received 917 votes or 3.02% and she will probably have the highest amount of support of the four in this tier.

When looking at the Tier Two candidates we will point out both have run citywide before and in 2009 Goldstein lost his reelection bid for the school board and received 4517 votes or 16.56%. In 2013, in his bid for mayor Holden received 4978 votes or 16.41%. These two candidates may have the greatest effect on the race because if they can carry comparable numbers, depending on turnout, they can have a block of double digits in support.

The major factors in this race are turnout, perceived strength of voter support, endorsements, and financial strength. Given the ludicrous system of Ranked Voting, the depth of the field and the different factionalization of specific constituency groups split support among the various unions and the continuing low-grade fever people are experiencing from Washington, DC, we are not expecting any candidate to carry a majority.

This will once again prove Ranked Choice Voting does not live up to its claims.

Minneapolis Mayor’s Race 2017: 82 Days and Counting

There are sixteen candidates for mayor this go-round versus thirty-five in 2013. We expect the decline is due to the $500 filing fee, which can be offset by securing 500 valid signatures, which by our measure is too low of a bar for entry.

As we did in the St Paul race we will place this field into tiers.

The Tier One candidates are State Rep. Raymond Dehn (DFL-59A, Minneapolis), current City Council Member (Ward 3) Jacob Frey (DFL), Businessman Tom Hoch (DFL), Incumbent Mayor Betsy Hodges (DFL), and from NAACP Executive Director Nekima Levy-Pounds (DFL).

The Tier Two candidates are Al Flowers (DFL), and Aswar Rahman (DFL) who both made thoughtful and impassioned speeches at the Minneapolis DFL City Convention.

The Tier Three candidates are: Troy Benjegerdes (who filed as Farmer Labor), Charlie Gers (L), LA Nik (I), Gregg A. Iverson who filed as DFL, but has always been known as a Republican, Ron Lischeid (People over Politics), David Rosenfeld (Socialist Workers Party), Ian Simpson (The Ideal Party), Captain Jack Sparrow (Basic Income Guarantee), and David John Wilson (Rainbows Butterflies Unicorns).

As is the case Tier Three will likely contain around 10% or less of the overall vote. In 2013, Sparrow received 352 votes or .44%, Benjegerdes received a high water mark of 167 votes or .21%, and Iverson 156 votes or .19%.

As was the case in 2013, we are highly doubtful there will be a winner by majority come November.  If any candidate tops forty-three percent and someone will bet on another candidate going past them as the votes are re-ranked, take the bet.  Forty-three is our “magic number” for a first ballot path to eventual victory.

With Hodges selection of Medaria Arradondo as Police Chief, she may have made a significant mayoral decision, which will assuage the hostility on the Northside to some degree. It also proves the advantage of incumbency.

Robbers Score Arms From Carter

We learned of a recent robbery at the home of mayoral candidate and former St Paul City Council member Melvin Carter III (DFL). During the theft of various items we understand two handguns are now in the circulation with the seedy underbelly community.

We have made a number of calls into the Carter Campaign, but the phone only seems to work in one direction.

As we continue our coverage of this election, we intend to provide every campaign the benefit of the doubt and ask questions in order to better understand the situation and issues associate, but when silence is the response the only conclusions to be draw come from the information as presented to us.

We hope a small chiding will change the resulting perspective.

Increasing the Temperature of the St Paul Mayor’s Race.

We are hearing from multiple sources of additional scrutiny expected into former City Council Mayoral candidate Melvin Carter III (DFL) background and finances. These types of rumors were discussed prior to the St Paul City DFL Convention, by never materialized.

We expect the discussion will begin, with questions raised about Carter’s fitness for office, due to his personal finances, tax payments, and past martial conflicts. This may backfire if there is a perception the questions raised are just against the only person of color who is poised to win.

Stay tuned and we will be the primary place where this information is first aired.

Capitol City Mayor’s Race 2017

The filing period for Mayor has commenced and will continue until August 15th. To date the field consists of: former City Council Member (Ward One) Melvin Carter III (DFL), Elizabeth Dickinson (GR), former School Board Member Tom Goldstein (DFL), businessman Tim Holden (Ind), former City Council Member (Ward Three) Pat Harris (DFL) and current City Council Member (Ward One) Dai Thao (DFL). Upon the filings close, the race to the finish line will begin in earnest.

Unlike the Minneapolis race, a surprise is still be possible in Saint Paul’s Mayor’s race.  The biggest change in the mix would be another woman, especially a DFLer?  There is also the possibility of another strong school board candidate that might bring out a different set of voters to the polls?  Some of Saint Paul’s traditional “free spirited” candidates have yet to be heard from. We think that it is likely that the line to Ramsey County Elections Director Joe Mansky’s domain will be longer, rather than shorter before the doors are locked for good and the ballot finalized.

The issue over whether or not enough signatures were achieved in a bid to move municipal elections to even years is in district court tomorrow, and even though this is a stupid idea, we hope the court will be wise enough to prevent the issue from appearing on the ballot.

As in Minneapolis, we think that turnout will be crucial in the Saint Paul races.  At this moment, we think it may be lower than many are predicting. Again, what will that mean? How will ranked choice voting play out?  Will the race be close enough for someone to leapfrog their way past the early leader(s)?   If so, who could this said someone be? what are the odds, long or short for such occurrence to happen? Additionally, how will identify politics play out in this race?  If at all?

Learning the flow rate of the monies raised, spent and which remain on hand and will provide a comprehensive breakdown later because reports are not due until September 12th, eight weeks before the General Election. This will answer a series of questions. How much will it make a difference?  Will these amounts be decisive, or is the likely electorate so composed of regular voters that the Saintly City’s version of the Old Gray Lady, the Pioneer Press, which has shown an interest in the mayor’s race, be all that the people need turn to, except of course C&B?

Is demography destiny?  Will Wards Three and Four be the electoral giants that determine the winner? Or, will a different dynamic emerge?

After an election cycle virtually void of lawn signs, will the multiple candidates raise a bumper crop of self-serving two by two or two by four placards?  Will there be a self-righteous backlash?

Stay tuned for continued the updates, Follow us on Twitter checksnbalances.

Mill City Mayor’s Race 2017

Here is a sample of the discussions that we are having and hearing as we head to the start of the spring to the November finish line. What will matter, what will get people’s attention and other thoughts – random or otherwise.

Filing – will there be any surprises?  Unlikely at the mayoral level.  Probably none that will make a difference at the council or park board level.

Turnout – the $64,000 question.  We think it will be up, but where and with who are the key questions. More on this in our weekly updates.

Events – one of the candidates is the incumbent.  Events always matter. They are a double-edged sword.  They can sink the incumbent or they can make the incumbent look mayoral and separate said incumbent from the challenges.  Events can play into the hands of challengers wheelhouses or events can create challenges for candidates. Again, more in the weekly updates.

Downtown – always a part of the story (in both cities) and now that downtown has become such a residential neighborhood, will that change the traditional “rest of the city versus the greedy downtown” narrative that often drives discussion?  If so, who is favored?  Will downtown residents vote in higher percentages than the rest of the city?  If so, shut and for which candidate?

How liberal/progressive will the actual electorate be? How old? How diverse?

Lots to follow. We will try to zero in on these and other breaking events in the upcoming updates. We may follow conventional wisdom, or we may surprise you.

The information on campaign finance is in and we will scrutinize those numbers and see if any clear indications present themselves.

Stay tuned.

The Old Saw of Twin City Municipal Tensions: Neighborhoods v. Downtown

Former Minneapolis City Council member Steve Cramer, now head of the Downtown Council rekindled a long simmering debate in Minneapolis recently with a Counterpoint Opinion Piece in the Star Tribune entitled In planning the city’s new core, we look up, not down.

As he highlighted the issues of concern he has with the direction of the Mill City, he focused on the in migration of businesses into the downtown. This traditional juxtaposition of business interests, which are often people who do not live within the city boundary and people who reside in the city limit is not a valid any longer. As we have also seen in St Paul, the people who decry the availability of skyway access and routes of travel between the skyscrapers then need to also acknowledge the vibrancy of downtown is due in large part because people live there.

The expenditures of monies in the downtown core often brings about controversy, but face it that is what people think about first when they talk about a city, it’s downtown amenities. There is a new dynamic to consider and that is the fact, Downtown is now a neighborhood too.

The interests of business now must be offset by the interests of downtown residents. The number of businesses who do commerce throughout the day and evening need to take into the idea of operating in a shift mentality. There are retired people who live there as well as people who work 1st, 2nd and 3rd shift. The ability for the community to thrive is not to pull up stakes after 5 pm, but look to other opportunities throughout the day. If Minneapolis and St Paul want to become true mature cities their vibrancy needs to evolve to the same structure as cable news, a 24-hour cycle or at least a 20-hour cycle. If the millennials ever organize then a new political power group could seek change.

There are reasons why Mickie’s Dinner is a St Paul icon, because it is open 24-hours. Similarly, so is Fed Ex and you can mail, ship or work on a project anytime of the day.

Any issue of safety and security in the skyways is because uniformed police do not randomly patrol them. The skyways need to either be incorporated as a regular part of a beat where police get out of their cars and walk through, security cameras need to be in place and vagrants need to be moved along and prevented from relieving themselves in the alcoves of these concourses.

As these new realities come to the fore the structural balance between the interests creates opportunities for dialogue.

Minneapolis DFL City Convention

4:53 PM

We are on-hand for the Minneapolis DFL City Convention it has been a long day. It is 4:53 pm and the first candidate for Mayor Rep. Ray Dehn (DFL59B, Minneapolis) is speaking. There was a Rules fight earlier in the day that resulted in a process that will nearly assure No Endorsement.

There is a Drop Rule applied on the 3rd ballot of 10%, this is not a method that enables a candidate to achieve the required 60% endorsement because it means there will still be four candidates on the 4th Ballot.

The seven nominated candidates were: Dehn, Ward 1 Council Member Jacob Frey (DFL), Mayor Betsy Hodges (DFL), Tom Hoch (DFL), Al Flowers (DFL), Aswar Rahman (DFL) and Captain Jack Sparrow. We expect the order of the first ballot will be Frey, Dehn. Hodges, and Hoch followed by the rest.

6:50 PM

We are finally, heading into the 1st ballot, with 1260 delegates voting. Our speculative numbers show Frey leading with 450 votes for 35.7%, followed by Dehn with 350 votes for 27.7%, Hodges with 250 votes for 19.8%, and Hoch with 126 for 10%. These are ballpark figures.

They are allowing the media to observe and we will be in the teller room.

Here are pictures from inside the teller room.

The candidates were asked if they would abide by the endorsement, with a caveat it meant if someone else was endorsed.

Frey abide, Dehn abide, Hodges abide, Hoch abide, Flowers no sure, Rahman abide, and Sparrow no.

Actual first ballot results.

1326 votes cast. Dehn 401 votes 32.44%, Frey 344 votes 27.83%, Hodges 299 votes 24.19%, Hoch 131 votes 10.60%, Flowers 15 votes 1.21%, Rahman 24 votes 1.94%, and Sparrow 4 votes .32% No Endorsement 18 votes 1.46% and Spoiled 17.  FlowersRahman and Sparrow drop. 

8:50 PM

It looks like the Hodges, and Hoch campaigns are preparing to release their delegates and walk out of the convention.

9:57 PM

After a lengthy debate the delegates voted to adjourn.


MPLS DFL Convention Countdown: Day Ten

We are having a bit more trouble getting our hands on the full delegate and alternate list for the Mpls DFL City Convention because the list we have lacks emails and phone numbers. We are aggressively seeking additional information for our list so that we can directly contact the attendees prior to the July 8th event. We encourage anyone interested to either provide us with the information or share it with people from the thirteen Wards. We will rely on social media to dissemination our information, and encourage our readers to make suggestions for different Twitter hashtags.

We will start as we did with the St Paul City Convention and recycle our tips and tricks. These are intended to provide information about conventions we believe are helpful pieces of information.  Again, if you have any suggestions we will accept them willingly and publish accordingly.

Convention Tips & Tricks

  1. If you are committed to a candidate, wear a t-shirt or at least a button, candidates have limited time to talk to people at a convention, and if you want the person you support to win, help them out by being well-identified.
  2. If you are uncommitted, do not wear buttons, or wear everyone’s button. If you seek to confuse candidate’s, and their campaigns being elusive is the best route.
  3. The best campaign has the best hospitality room. delegates and alternates are the purposes of why campaigns stock up on snacks, drinks and provide everything from bagels & coffee in the morning, to pizza and pop for lunch. Even if you support a specific candidate go to the other candidate’s rooms and see what they offer, they may try to sway you with gourmet coffee or some other tasty treat.

As we come into the Mpls City Convention we have learned a few interesting items. The Convention is going to be held at the Mpls Convention Center and will cost $30,000. The price tag will seem a great waste of money, especially if it fails to deliver a DFL endorsement in the mayoral contest, which is our expectation.

We are still awaiting the names of the Convention Co-Chairs, but have been informed Jason Cassady will be the Parliamentarian. This news comes as a pleasant surprise because Cassady has provided supporters of Ranked Choice as the Drop Rule a significant boost to their argument when he provided research on the issue for the DFL Constitution and Bylaws Commission and Rules Committee.

Rules Committee

One factor from the meeting of the Rules Committee evident to use is the inherent weakness of the Tom Hoch Campaign on the floor of the Convention. As we listened to the debate over the drop rules, thresholds, and speech time, it was clear Hoch has a weak hand. Despite having a majority on the Rules Committee, the Hoch campaign on agreed to a drop rule of 10% on any ballot prior to the next ballot being the final ballot. It did not change whether the ballots were limited to five, four or three, but the height of the threshold percentage their campaign would agree to was fixed at 10%.

This leads us to believe the Hoch campaign’s ceiling is close to 10%.

Another point during the Rules Committee meeting Ron Wacks attempted to pay the role as self-anointed broker and that is a fool’s errand Wacks should never be sought out or used as a medium for any conversation of substance. He was such a poor chair at the St Paul Ward One and Two Conventions, he was disinvited from chairing at the City Convention. Take heed and act accordingly.

Why RCV as the Drop Rule, is an Available Option.

Here is the following information we received prior to the St Paul City Convention.

Hi Shawn,

This email is in response to your question about the use of RCV as a drop rule.

Jason’s analysis below is specifically regarding the use of RCV to bestow an endorsement.  I have confirmed with Jason that his analysis does NOT address the use of RCV as a drop rule.

The DFL has historically granted wide latitude for rules committees and conventions to select a drop rule appropriate to their situation.  Units have used many different formulae, such as a percentage threshold, a percentage with an “elevator” that increases the percentage, drop all but the top 2, or RCV to the top 2 (among others).  The final ballot(s) for the endorsement must be done with non-RCV at a 60% threshold (as Jason describes).

*Our State DFL documents (Constitution and Bylaws, and Official Call) are silent on drop rules.*  However, the model rules for local unit conventions does include a drop rule, as do the Temporary and Proposed Permanent State Convention rules.

Kind regards, Chris Thorp Co-chair of the DFL State Constitution, Bylaws, and Rules Committee

Jason Cassady – drafter of the forwarded message below, Jill Garcia – Co-chair of the DFL State Constitution, Bylaws, and Rules Committee, Libby Kantner – Chair of the St. Paul DFL and Rick Varco – Vice Chair of the St. Paul DFL

———- Forwarded message ———-

I have reviewed our national and state party rules.  The only mention of Ranked Choice Voting is in the Official Call, where we have specifically permitted its use for the election of a party officer when only one position is open on the ballot (e.g., table officer, or filling a vacancy for a single director).  It is otherwise not prohibited, permitted, or addressed.

Turning back to the question at hand, when our documents are silent we are governed by Robert’s Rules of Order.  On Page 426 is the following:

While it is more complicated than other methods of voting in common use and is not a substitute for the normal procedure of repeated balloting until a majority is obtained, preferential voting is especially useful and fair in an election by mail if it is impractical to take more than one ballot. In such cases it makes possible a more representative result than under a rule that a plurality shall elect. It can be used with respect to the election of officers only if expressly authorized in the bylaws.  (emphasis added.)

First, I would note that Robert’s refers to ranked choice voting as “preferential voting” (see pages 426-28 for a full discussion).  Accordingly, I draw your attention to the fact that the first sentence of the above quotation does not permit use of ranked choice voting except when it is “impractical to take more than one ballot.”  While it may be desired to take only one ballot at a convention, it is not impractical.  Second, I direct your attention to the last sentence of the above quote, where it provides that ranked choice voting cannot be used to elect officers unless expressly authorized in the bylaws.  Robert’s does not really address endorsement as we use the term.  Rather, our endorsement is similar to an election which requires 60% and has the option of no election.  Thus, one could extrapolate from that sentence that because we do not expressly permit endorsement by use of ranked choice voting, we cannot use it.

Regardless of your position on the second point I have made, I believe the first point is directly on point, and it is not impractical to hold multiple ballots, and thus use of 2nd choice ballots, etc., via ranked choice voting is not permitted for endorsement.

I hope this email answers your question.

Thank you. Jason

Following my previous email, I consulted further with Jason, and am providing this email as follow-up.

RONR contains a mix of recommendations, requirements, and factual statements.  The language on “preferential voting” is a recommendation and not a requirement (“should” vs. “shall” or “must”).  The first portion of language cited by Jason is actually a recommendation and not a requirement. Roberts continues in that section, on page 428, to state:

The system of preferential voting just described should not be used in cases where it is possible to follow the normal procedure of repeated balloting until one candidate or proposition attains a majority. Although this type of preferential ballot is preferable to an election by plurality, it affords less freedom of choice than repeated balloting, because it denies voters the opportunity of basing their second or lesser choices on the results of earlier ballots, and because the candidate or proposition in last place is automatically eliminated and may thus be prevented from becoming a compromise choice. (emphasis mine)

If it were prohibited in all cases where it is otherwise possible to conduct repeated balloting, it would be “shall not” be used.

With our long standing practice of using drop rules in our endorsement process, we are largely subject to the negative effect cited by RONR against using preferential voting – namely that the last place is automatically eliminated (often subject to a percentage threshold).  We partially mitigate the negative effects by not dropping below 2 candidates.

Regarding the second portion, the prohibition on use for officer elections unless authorized by the bylaws, I see our endorsements more akin to other resolutions with multiple choices.  It is effectively a multiple-choice motion that permits future monetary and volunteer commitments to be made.

Regardless, it is clear that reasonable people can make different interpretations with respect to the language contained in RONR and endorsements, which include, but are not limited to:  (1) the above quoted language prohibits use of ranked choice voting for both the endorsement and the drop rule; and (2) that the extrapolation of the above language relating to an election is completely irrelevant and should not be consulted with respect to endorsements.

Given this fact, Jason and I now agree that the entire subject of ranked choice voting and endorsements is a gray area (which we will work to clarify with the CBRC for future cycles).  Accordingly, because the convention is the highest ranking body of an organization, we are inclined to defer to the will of that convention with respect to use or non-use of ranked choice voting as a drop rule.  While a gray area, drop rules vary wildly, and are not addressed in our party rules or RONR (either as a permitted activity or limited in any fashion).  Because we as a party have a long history of allowing conventions to establish their own drop rules as they see fit, it seems reasonable to us to believe that use of ranked choice voting as a drop rule would survive challenge (so long as no reallocated votes were used in issuing the endorsement).  See, e.g., the discussion on Custom on page 19 of RONR.

Although there is a reasonable argument that use of ranked choice voting is not prohibited for endorsement itself, we recommend against use of reallocated votes for endorsement.  This is political, practical advice.  As a matter of illustration, I would note that when the ranked choice voting procedures section was added to the Official Call, the CBRC debated whether to extend this authority to endorsements, and it was rejected.  While that rejection is not binding (i.e., no prohibition was voted upon and added to the rules), it is a window into the thinking of many CBRC members (especially given that the CBRC is made up of members statewide, and ranked choice voting is not generally as popular or widely supported outside of the metro).  So, for political, practical reasons to ensure that an endorsement could withstand a challenge, Jason and I advise that ranked choice voting not be used to reallocate votes in a manner which results in an endorsement.

Kind regards, Chris Thorp Co-chair of the DFL State Constitution, Bylaws, and Rules Committee



Minneapolis DFL City Convention Set-up for Epic Failure

We were on-hand for the Minneapolis DFL City Rules Committee meeting yesterday held in a packed conference room at the Minneapolis Central Labor Union Council. This was the second meeting after the first resulted in an impasse. Sunday’s meeting produced a set of Rules for the mayoral contest angled for No Endorsement. The position was advanced by the Tom Hoch campaign lead by Kieran McCarney, Campaign Manager. The Hoch campaign had succeeded in over-stocking the Rules Committee with delegate strength which far exceeds its floor strength. The reason being the Rules Committee spots which remained unfilled from the 13 Ward Conventions were filled at the Executive Committee by anyone who showed interest.

The result of the 2 ½ hour meeting was a set of Rules, destined to fail on the floor, mainly because the Hoch Campaign failed to listen to the voices of the other three contending campaigns for State Representative Ray Dehn (DFL-59B, Minneapolis), Ward 3 City Council Member Jacob Frey (DFL), and Incumbent Mayor Betsy Hodges (DFL). The other candidates in the field are Al FlowersJeffrey Sterling Olson, Aswar Rahman, and Captain Jack Sparrow.

This proposed set of Rules, will clearly fail on the floor, and the Rules Committee passed a Minority Report calling for the application of the DFL Party’s Model Rules, which are: 10 minute speeches, with a drop of the lowest candidate on the ballot, seeing no endorsement of 60% proceeding to another ballot. This is to continue until a candidate receives 60% majority, with No Endorsement an option on every ballot.There was an attempt to strike a compromise, but that too failed to pass because it like the Hoch proposal provides no path to an endorsement.  What did pass 5-minute speeches, no Q & A, a 5% minimum threshold on the 2nd ballot, and no further balloting after the 3rd ballot. This passed on an 11-9 vote, with Hoch carrying the day.

There was a discussion of the use of Ranked Choice Voting (RCV), and Jeff Strand proposed the idea over the phone, but both the Dehn and Hodges campaigns expressed their opposition to the idea, being included in the Minority Report. We have already had conversations about an amendment to the Minority Report being included with a couple of reconsiderations of the vote on this question since it only requires three people to support a Minority Report.

Even if RCV is not included in the initial documents being made available to the delegates, we understand it will be coming from the floor as an amendment with broad support. The stage is set for Minneapolis to follow St Paul’s historic move to replace the Majority Report with the Minority Report after a protracted floor fight. In St Paul, it took 2 hours.

As we did for the St Paul DFL City Convention, we will be writing a Convention Countdown starting later this week and providing Delegates information about information being discussed by the campaigns, suggestions for items to look for during the convention and important influential activities relevant to the Convention. Stay tuned.

We also will accept information from people if they want to communicate through C&B to the delegates. Email:

Future Viability of the St Paul DFL in Doubt

The results of the St Paul DFL City Convention this weekend begs a specific question.  If the only result is an endorsement for school board candidates, can the DFL survive in the era of Ranked Choice Voting? The failure to achieve an endorsement in the race for mayor evolved from a series of factors: 1) The existence of Ranked Choice Voting (RCV); 2) The lack of incentive for any aspiring candidates to leave the field; 3) The egotism of each self-anointed candidate; and 4) The fact that no specific person exists to broker a deal and cull the field.

The fact that Melvin Carter III led on each ballot; First: 47.26%, Second:  50.57%, Third: 51.71%, Fourth: 52,20% and finally the Fifth:  54.72%, but failed to achieve the required 60%. This was due to a 7:00 p.m. time certain adjournment of the convention, in respect for the fast-ending Iftar meal of the Muslim delegates, who principally supported third place candidate Pat Harris on each ballot. Had the delegates continued to vote past the self-imposed time limit, the convention could have been accused of being culturally insensitive to the Islamic community but may have reached an endorsement on subsequent ballots. One of the realities of an endorsement process is the factor of attrition, and that is why alternates are selected as a part of the process. The results of the convention by ballot are reflected in a previous article here on C&B.

There was not a great deal of attrition during the five ballots. Initially, there were 529 delegates voting, then 524 on the 2nd, 526 on the 3rd, 520 on the 4th, and lastly 508 or 92.63% of the total available in the end. The reality is Carter only needed 26 votes to achieve the endorsement. There were 93 people who voted No Endorsement on the 5th ballot, largely Harris supporters because he was dropped after the fourth ballot.

The set-up to the endorsement balloting was staged from the fight at the start of the convention over the proposed Rules and the Agenda. As we had communicated C&B Publisher Shawn Towle was a delegate to the convention and played a significant role in starting the Rules committee debate. Upon the presentation of the Rules Committee report by Rick Varco. Towle challenged the validity of the meeting first called on the 25th of May, and then changed to May 30th, due to Varco’s personal conflict as a lobbyist with the original meeting date and the call of a Special Session at the legislature.

The significance of the meeting date change meant a delegate to the Rules Committee who supported Carter, John Sherman, was replaced by a delegate supporting Harris, Darren Tobolt. This single change shifted the balance of power from a 7-7 tie to an 8-6 advantage for the Harris and Dai Thao coalition. At the convention, Tom Goldstein joined the Harris/Thao side, and that is why the forthcoming Rules Committee vote became such a nail biter.

During the debate, the chairs of the convention ruled in direct conflict with the DFL Party’s Constitution, which is the document that is supposed to supersede all other documents. Varco’s use of an email notification as a valid form of contact to Rules Committee members also violated the 10-day requirement as required by the Constitution. After being ruled out of order, Towle challenged the chairs Sue Moravec and Tim O’Brien, based on their lack of adherence to the Constitution, and their overall inconsistency. Upon a vote of the delegates, Towle’s challenge prevailed. This then provided an opportunity for the Minority Report of Rules Committee member Eric T. Nelson to be presented and it was approved on a vote of 228 to 224. The new Majority Report was a staggering change because in DFL history this is likely the first Minority Report to fully replace a Majority Report.

The new Majority Report was then amended to include a time certain end of 7:00 p.m. This was a structural compromise, reached after a lengthy debate extending he original drop-dead time of 5:00 PM by two hours. Effectively, because of the length of the two-hour debate, things were a wash.

In another move to challenge the DFL to be consistent, Towle moved to amend the new Rules and apply Instant Run-off Voting (IRV) as the drop rule.  This failed resoundingly and proves the DFL is hypocritical. because they expect the General Election voters to use a preferential voting system when they refuse to do so themselves. Ironically, had they used the IRV, they would have started with four candidates on the first ballot and had two candidates on the 2nd, and then with a head-to-head contest, they might have achieved an endorsement.

Now that the convention has ended, the air has gone out of the balloon and the effect on the campaign this summer will be an arduous process. The candidates will seek organizational endorsements, attempt to self-define for the voters, who are not likely to pay attention until October, or if they are lucky, in September. It shifts the dynamic away from a viable political organization (St Paul DFL) supporting a candidate to forcing a candidate to seek financial support from outside groups.  The DFL endorsement is the big Kahuna and lacking such, means the various combination of labor unions, associations, and advocacy organizations are seeking to create a unique tapestry or matrix of support.

If a Primary/General Election system were in place, past opponents would normally lick their wounds and massage their bruised egos and either endorse one of the two Primary winners. They need time to say, “Initially I was a Harris supporter at the convention, but I am okay with voting for Carter because he has the endorsement” or “I voted for Thao in the Primary, but can support Carter or Harris in the General.” Because this healing ritual will not occur between the convention in June up to August or from August onto November, it will need to take place after the election, but before the inauguration. This will be a significant issue. Because during the 2017 campaign as candidates are trying to differentiate themselves from one another the public may not even participate.

Since we heard Thao pound the podium, the one he had constructed to provide better optics, we are hearing a series of rants from an angry Asian man. He was joined in doing so by a friend of Philando Castile and the shrill nature of the message is not one welcoming to general St Paul voters. One of the points of his vexed anger was directed at the Carter campaign, because of the investigation by the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, and the issues of illegal campaign solicitation. We are wondering if Thao will be vindictive and act out against Carter.

We know Carter has some wind in his sails despite not achieving the endorsement. There is already speculation Thao or some other entity like the Police Federation, which supports Harris, will be drawing attention to matters about Carter intended to embarrass or create a negative impression. Now, it might not be Thao who broaches the issue, because RCV is supposed to reduce negative campaigning, but it does not prevent third-party organizations from doing so. Since the normal therapeutic ritual will not occur, especially for the four DFL candidates, the post-election time will be a unique time.

Since the normal therapeutic ritual will not occur, especially for the four DFL candidates, the post-election time will be a unique time.

There still is the possibility that additional candidates will enter the field, including other DFLers, especially, a female candidate, who could provide a viable alternative. The filing deadline is August 15, 2017. In addition to the four DFLers, there are two other announced candidates, Elizabeth Dickinson (Gr) and Tim Holden (I).

The irony of ironies will be if one of the DFLers emerges victorious, and then four years from now, he and his supporters come to the DFL convention and seek the endorsement. This after they, except for the Carter campaign, were instrumental in undermining or better yet sabotaging the entire St Paul DFL endorsement process. The ripples of the repercussions will be felt for years. This simple fact may bring about the demise of the St Paul DFL unless Ranked Choice Voting is eliminated.

On the Floor at the St Paul DFL City Convention

We are sitting on the floor, listening to the last question being asked of the four candidates for the DFL endorsement for mayor, Dai Thao, Tom Goldstein, Pat Harris and Melvin Carter III. The biggest question on the first ballot will be whether Carter achieves 50% and whether the combined support for the other three candidates hold 40%.

We think Carter will lead followed by Harris, Thao, and Goldstein.

The biggest fight today has been on the Rules of the Convention and the Agenda. The Rules vote was 228 to 224, the Agenda passed by a far higher margin. There were several controversial, challenges to the Chair, in which two prevailed on one failed. Later that delegate’s credential was challenged and he survived the push to remove him from the floor.

We are trying to obtain the results of the first ballot before they are announced from the podium. So far with 529 delegates voting Carter is leading with 250 votes for 47.26%, Thao 120 votes for 22.68% and Harris 114 votes for 21.55% Goldstein 38 votes for 7.18. No Endorsement 7 votes for 1.32%. Carter dominated in Ward Four.roderick

2nd Ballot results are in. With 524 delegates voting Carter is leading with 265 votes for 50.57%, Thao 111 votes for 21.18% and Harris 111 votes for 21.18% Goldstein 36 votes for 6.87. No Endorsement 1 vote for 0.19% there was 1 spoiled ballot.

3rd Ballot results are in. Goldstein was dropped from the ballot With 526 delegates voting Carter is leading with 27 votes for 51.71%, Thao 123 votes for 23.38% and Harris 121 votes for 23.00% No Endorsement 10 votes for 1.90%.

The ballot for School Board is in John BroderickJeannie Foster and Marny Xiong were endorsed. There were 521 votes cast Broderick received 368 votes for 70.63%, Foster 382 votes for 73.32% and Marny Xiong received 362 votes for 69.48%. Eduardo Barrera only received 267 votes for 51,25% and did not clear the 60% threshold.

4th Ballot results are in.  With 520 delegates voting Carter is leading with 270 votes for 52.22%, Thao 122 votes for 23.51% and Harris 119 votes for 22.93% No Endorsement 7 votes for 1.35%.

5th Ballot results are in.  Harris was dropped from the next ballot. With 508 delegates voting Carter is still leading with 271 votes for 52.22%, Thao 122 votes for 23.51% and 119 votes for 22.93% No Endorsement 7 votes for 0.19%. The convention will adjourn at 7:00 PM.

This is the last ballot. With 508 delegates voting Carter is still leading with 278 votes for 54.72%, Thao 137 votes for 26.97% and 119 votes for 22.93% No Endorsement 93 votes for 18.31% and 6 Spoiled Ballots. There is No Endorsement.


St Paul DFL City Convention Countdown: Day One

Sorry, we missed Countdown Day Two, but honestly, there wasn’t much new information that came our way to share. Today, as we view the field of candidates, follow the discussion about the pending Rules fight, prepare ourselves for the role we intend to play, and survey the landscape, we gleaned a significant piece of information. The Melvin Carter III campaign is prepared for a No Endorsement convention. This is not to say they are working toward it, but will be resolved if that is the results. This is surprising because they seem to be the only campaign poised to capture the endorsement.

This resolution puts a different twist on the conventions start because it means Carter can be who he is, have fun, show everyone the due level of respect and contest openly and honestly. This is compared to the Dai Thao and Pat Harris campaigns who by their collusion are showing just the opposite.

Our position remains, we doubt there will be an endorsement, no matter what Rules are in place, which is why we support the change in the Rules and use of Instant Run-off Voting (IRV) as the Drop Rule. Using IRV will expedite the process and enable to contest to start with two candidates in the fastest manner possible while keeping alive the option for every delegate to vote No Endorsement at any time. The importance of the No Endorsement vote by delegates, whose candidate removed from the ballot means the number of delegates available remains fixed at the highest number established on the first ballot. While each ballot is its own quorum test the higher the number is to the available total of 550 creates a solid test for a 60% majority, required for the endorsement.

Tips & Tricks

  1. Delegates should always know where their alternates are at. When a Delegate leaves the Convention Floor they are supposed to relinquish their badge and their Alternate is available to be upgraded. Even when going out to use the facilities is a point of time where an Alternate could be allowed on the floor.
  2. DFL conventional are often held in school cafeterias. This enables the Delegates to sit across the table from each other kibitz and spread all the literature and materials out in front of them. It is not a bad idea to bring a book along to the Convention because there will definitely be breaks in the action and people will have available leisure time.
  3. Delegates can move around on the floor and talk to each other. Only during a vote are people required to be in a specific place.

Repke Resigns from St Paul Charter Commission

Because of the timidity of St Paul Charter Commission Chair Richard Kramer, Charter Commission Member Chuck Repke resigned yesterday. Repke’s reason for quitting is not reflected in the language of the resignation letter, but in a private conversation, which contained many expletives and plenty of disparaging comments about KramerRepke made his sentiments clear.  

He (Kramer) is best characterized as having an obstinate attitude and operating like a dictator which as a public official is embarrassing behavior. This is something people should know about before they ever appoint him to another public position. He currently serves as a member of the Metropolitan Council.

This leaves the issue of Ranked Choice Voting being on the November ballot in doubt, which is a major deal especially since the votes to pass it are there.

St Paul DFL City Convention Countdown: Day Three

As we get past the hump of the day we are looking forward to a City Convention poised to accomplish a herculean task. If the Minority Report to the Rules Committee passes, it will the first time in the history of the DFL Party where this has happened. Sure, there have been Minority Reports accepted and folded into the Majority, which has passed previously but never has a whole scale replacement set passed on its own.

If it is to do so we say Bully for it proponents, of which, we consider Checks & Balances to be in the mix. We have heard little chatter about the issue on the message boards or in different conversations, but often, little talk leads us to believe more acceptance than opposition exists.

Tips & Tricks

  1. Watch for something new to occur. There will be a person who emerges as a recognizable leader or an issue of worthy value that will magically appear. Granted, you might not recognize that this happened until later, but most assuredly something will.
  2. Take time to talk to your fellow delegates about their knowledge and experience. If you ask many will be very forthcoming and there might be a significant amount of information to be shared.
  3. If you are unsure about something find a person with whom you agree with philosophically and ask them their take on an issue, and you might find an ally and someone to follow. Understand they may see the same characteristics in you and may defer to you on other issues, especially if you show you’re passionate about it.

Moveable Chess Pieces

If the Convention starts with a feeling of two different camps ready to square off, and the first-floor fights show clearly defined sides of opposition it will be a long day. If every item is followed by a point of order, and questions of the chair it will seem never-ending and be a truly painful exercise. But if the first few matters are challenged and resolved and the Convention begins to flow and items start to fall off the agenda quickly it can be a fun event.

We will be most interested in the proceedings once there are only two in competition for the mayor and who the remaining candidate is besides Melvin Carter III. If it is Dai Thao we doubt there will be an endorsement because of the clear identity politics present in the room. If it were to be Pat Harris then the question becomes whether or not Thao releases his delegates or just has them vote No Endorsement. We are fairly well assured if Harris is dropped his supporters will vote No Endorsement on each subsequent ballot, but we will need to be at the Convention to make the same determination about the Thao supporters.

Tom Goldstein might be in the perfect position to play powerbroker because the votes on the Minority Report may be so close that his 4% of the delegates or 25 people could play a sizeable role in the outcome.

If anyone has specific insight please let us know. Se are also interested in people’s thoughts on the proposed Minority Report.

For the record, we will be publishing live from the Convention floor throughout the day.

Enbridge Pipeline Issue, Simple, More Safety, Less Profit Margin

We attended last night’s public hearing on the proposed pipeline to replace line number three. Now it is clear this project could do a number of positive things, increase the jobs in a great number of communities, where those jobs would be a significant boost to the local economies, and if done right could improve the emergency response services in the area. Now, you may ask why we focused on the emergency services, its simple because the pipeline to be installed is expected to fail on the average on once every four years.

Is the risk worth it, not really? Because we always have felt increasing the potential environmental problems is never worth the risk. We ascribe to more of a belt and suspenders approach. Since rail cars are now required to be double walled we wonder is this pipeline double or even triple walled? Can’t many of the potential problems be offset by increased prevention efforts?

If the Draft Environmental Impact Statement calculates for a downstream effect of a spill to only 10 miles then make it 100. If a break in the pipe causes a high-pressure geyser to go off, then have a staged set off automatic shut offs staged at regular intervals, like every ten miles.

If leaving the old pipe in the ground means it must be cleaned up and maintained, then remove it all together. Have the old pipe in the ground is environment al waste, Clean It Up.

We can understand why people are distrusting of Enbridge, because of the spill at Kalamazoo, MI in 2010. The company has not shown itself to be a good corporate citizen. The steps the company is willing to go to protect its own interests, like not releasing the chemical profile of the additives used to liquify the tar sands oil sludge so that it is able to move through the pipe is a clear example. Who cares if it is a trade secret when the pipe breaks, and it will the responders need to be able to quickly avert the long-term adverse effects if they can at all.

We are hard pressed to understand why the higher value is to pump the nastiest, most corrosive, and least productive type of oil product across our state. We are nothing more than a pass-through place that assumes all the risk and reaps little by way of reward.

When we watched the proceedings last night it was hard to figure out if the evening was structured to be actually informative or if it was just window dressing for a dog and pony show.

If the Trump Administration is going to force feed our nation, nasty black goo, in a pursuit of purely profit motives, we already start from a poor place.

So, the answer is Enbridge what are you willing to do better tomorrow than you have proven to do so far?

St Paul City DFL Convention Countdown: Day Four

Our interest in the Convention Count Down is building, we have had twice as many people read Day Five and had read Day Six. Leading into the convention this is encouraging for those who value the process, and actually R-E-S-P-E-C-T the delegates and alternates.

The issues with the Rules Committee’s proposed Rules and Agenda has just gotten even more fascinating because the *correction Rules Committee member Eric T. Nelson* has submitted a Minority Report to the Rules Committee Chair Rick Varco and he had agreed to make copies for all the delegates to the convention. We also hear he secretly believes the report will pass.

As you can see we are pretty well-connected because we have a copy of the report and the accompanying agenda.

We will forgo Tips & Tricks this installment but will remind our readers C&B Publisher Shawn Towle is a delegate and he will be proposing in item 26 a “Friendly” Amendment to use Instant Run-off Voting as the method for the Drop Rule. He contacted the DFL Party Constitution & Bylaws Commission Co-Chair Chris Thorp who emailed the following:

Hi all,

Following my previous email, I consulted further with Jason, and am providing this email as a follow-up.

RONR contains a mix of recommendations, requirements, and factual statements.  The language on “preferential voting” is a recommendation and not a requirement (“should” vs. “shall” or “must”).  The first portion of language cited by Jason is actually a recommendation and not a requirement. Roberts continues in that section, on page 428, to state:

The system of preferential voting just described should not be used in cases where it is possible to follow the normal procedure of repeated balloting until one candidate or proposition attains a majority. Although this type of preferential ballot is preferable to an election by plurality, it affords less freedom of choice than repeated balloting, because it denies voters the opportunity of basing their second or lesser choices on the results of earlier ballots, and because the candidate or proposition in last place is automatically eliminated and may thus be prevented from becoming a compromise choice. (emphasis mine)

If it were prohibited in all cases where it is otherwise possible to conduct repeated balloting, it would be “shall not” be used.

With our long standing practice of using drop rules in our endorsement process, we are largely subject to the negative effect cited by RONR against using preferential voting – namely that that the last place is automatically eliminated (often subject to a percentage threshold).  We partially mitigate the negative effects by not dropping below 2 candidates.

Regarding the second portion, the prohibition on use for officer elections unless authorized by the bylaws, I see our endorsements more akin to other resolutions with multiple choices.  It is effectively a multiple-choice motion that permits future monetary and volunteer commitments to be made.

Regardless, it is clear that reasonable people can make different interpretations with respect to the language contained in RONR and endorsements, which include, but are not limited to:  (1) the above quoted language prohibits use of ranked choice voting for both the endorsement and the drop rule; and (2) that the extrapolation of the above language relating to an election is completely irrelevant and should not be consulted with respect to endorsements.

Given this fact, Jason and I now agree that the entire subject of ranked choice voting and endorsements is a gray area (which we will work to clarify with the CBRC for future cycles).  Accordingly, because the convention is the highest ranking body of an organization, we are inclined to defer to the will of that convention with respect to use or non-use of ranked choice voting as a drop rule.  While a gray area, drop rules vary wildly, and are not addressed in our party rules or RONR (either as a permitted activity or limited in any fashion).  Because we as a party have a long history of allowing conventions to establish their own drop rules as they see fit, it seems reasonable to us to believe that use of ranked choice voting as a drop rule would survive challenge (so long as no reallocated votes were used in issuing the endorsement).  See, e.g., the discussion on Custom on page 19 of RONR.

Although there is a reasonable argument that use of ranked choice voting is not prohibited for endorsement itself, we recommend against use of reallocated votes for endorsement.  This is political, practical advice.  As a matter of illustration, I would note that when the ranked choice voting procedures section was added to the Official Call, the CBRC debated whether to extend this authority to endorsements, and it was rejected.  While that rejection is not binding (i.e., no prohibition was voted upon and added to the rules), it is a window into the thinking of many CBRC members (especially given that the CBRC is made up of members statewide, and ranked choice voting is not generally as popular or widely supported outside of the metro).  So, for political, practical reasons to ensure that an endorsement could withstand a challenge, Jason and I advise that ranked choice voting not be used to reallocate votes in a manner which results in an endorsement.

Kind regards,

Chris Thorp

Co-chair of the DFL State Constitution, Bylaws, and Rules Committee

Minority Report-2017 St. Paul DFL City Rules






St Paul DFL City Convention Countdown: Day Five

We have received a mixed response to our posting yesterday because we actively sent out the article to St Paul DFL City Convention delegates and alternates. Some were appreciative and thankful and others, bitchy and questioning of the motivation behind the message. We have never been concerned with the opinions of the mealy-mouthed people over at the Spot Bar. It even started a conversation on Facebook, which unsubstantiated allegations were made by a party, which was later retracted and deleted. The main point we are expressing is this convention does not belong to the candidates, nor to the paid staff people, it is a voluntary enterprise, which shows the value of our democracy and the quality of the people who volunteer their time to participate.

Our Convention Countdown even started a conversation on Facebook, which unsubstantiated allegations were made by a party, which was later retracted and deleted. The main point we are expressing is this convention does not belong to the candidates, nor to the paid staff people, it is a voluntary enterprise, which shows the value of our democracy and the quality of the people who volunteer their time to participate.

Because of this investment made by people who truly care about their city, it is with the complete and total respect we are standing up for an open and honest endorsement process. Hat Tip to all the delegates and alternates for their dedication to St Paul.

Also if you would like to know an answer about anything or have a question just email

Tips & Tricks

  1. When you survey the hospitality, rooms figure out which one has the best cold drinks. If it is hot inside the building, though I have heard the air conditioning will be on grab two of your favorite beverages and bring them to the floor. It is important to hydrate.
  2. Identify the floor leaders for each campaign they are usually easy to spot. They likely have a t-shirt of the campaign on and may even have a headset on.
  3. Volunteer to be a teller. If you really want to know what happens on each vote then help count the votes. If you happen to see someone from Check & Balances let them know and then also tell them the vote totals on the various races. You will be well appreciated.

What is the St Paul DFL’s Purpose in an Area of Ranked Choice Voting?

We have two different contests happening on the same floor of the Washington Magnet School, a mayoral endorsement, and a school board endorsement. Each will have a different process. For mayor, you will vote for one person, but for school board, you can for vote up to three people. If you vote for only one it is called bullet balloting and this is a strategic move to concentration your one vote to a single candidate to heighten the impact of your vote and not increase the totals for the other candidates at the same time.

The only true value of the DFL endorsement appears to be for the school board candidates because with the DFL endorsement comes name recognition, placement on the sample ballot, access to DFL resources and financial support from organizations that help finance the St Paul DFL. If you support a school board candidate you will clearly see the difference come this Fall on the specific campaigns with or without the party endorsement.

Of course, whoever win the mayor’s race in 2017 will seek the DFL endorsement in 2021. But is endorsing an incumbent as important as endorsing a candidate for an open seat, of course, it is not, and the proposed Rules will bring about a no endorsement reality.

Come 2019 when the Ward endorsements occur; will the DFL endorsement matter if there still exists Ranked Choice Voting (RCV)? Well, there hasn’t been an endorsement in Ward 5 since the system has existed. Are you wondering why St Paul City Council members Rebecca Noecker Ward 2) and Amy Brendmoen (Ward 5) are not auto-delegates to the convention? It’s because they were not DFL endorsed in 2015.

Now, we contend the value of the St DFL endorsement is in a death spiral due to RCV in November, and if there is a benevolent God then there will be a revote on the ballot right after the mayoral election. Because there is little incentive for candidates to drop out of the race the election will be based on who can raise the most money and not creating an equalizer for a less financed like Paul Wellstone or Keith Ellison to improve their odds. Because everyone is in the boat in November the forecast is gloomy.


St Paul DFL Convention Countdown: Day Six

If you haven’t followed Checks & Balances, we tend to provide the most blanket coverage leading up to and about political conventions. With this as our specialty, we are going to provide a daily package of material about the convention process, what specific campaign’s focal points are, and other factors with influential potential.

We will start will a little levity.

Convention Tips & Tricks

  1. If you are committed to a candidate, wear a t-shirt or at least a button, candidates have limited time to talk to people at a convention, and if you want the person you support to win, help them out by being well-identified.
  2. If you are uncommitted, do not wear buttons, or wear everyone’s button. If you seek to confuse candidate’s, and their campaigns being elusive is the best route.
  3. The best campaign has the best hospitality room. delegates and alternates are the reasons why campaigns stock up on snacks, drinks and provide everything from bagels & coffee in the morning, to pizza and pop for lunch. Even if you support a specific candidate go to the other candidate’s rooms and see what they offer, they may try to sway you with gourmet coffee or chocolate.


What to Pay Attention To

Read the proposed Agenda and proposed Rules before the convention. The first order of business is the passage of the Agenda and this could be a point of contention if what is proposed differs with what a specific campaign wants. A prime example is the placement of the School Board candidate’s endorsement before the Mayoral endorsement. Since the bulk of the delegates and alternates were determined by sub-caucuses based on mayoral candidates this is the major event at the convention. If the proposed Agenda stands then delegates focused on the School Board races may leave and their alternates may be upgraded, shifting slightly the votes in the room.


Draft 2017 St. Paul DFL City Agenda


Draft 2017 St. Paul DFL City Rules


Prepare for a Rules fight. If you have been following Checks & Balances you know we have been shouting to high heaven about the collusion between St Paul City Council member Dai Thao’s (DFL-Ward 1) and the former City Council member Pat Harris’ (DFL-Ward 3) campaigns, if not scroll down the page. The main reason for this problem is two-fold and rests on the shoulders of the convener of the Rules Committee, SEIU Lobbyist Rick Varco.

As only an alternate the Rules Committee, Varco held great sway. He called the meeting, and changed the date of said meeting due to his work-related conflict with the Legislative Special Session, set the agenda of the meeting, and proposed his own set of Rules for the City Convention.

The result was lower representation for the former Council Member Melvin Carter III (DFL-Ward 1) campaign by one vote. With the short notice date change long-time Rules Committee veteran John Sherman, a Carter supporter, was unable to attend the meeting scheduled the day after Memorial Day. Instead, he was replaced by former St Paul DFL City Chair Darren Tolbolt, a Harris supporter. On nearly every issue brought before the Rules Committee, the resulting votes were 8-6. If Sherman had been present the votes would likely have been 7-7 ties. If the votes tied then both positions would have been brought before the entire delegation for their consideration.

One issue being, item 26 of the proposed Rules. There was a proposal to help the convention move along far more rapidly to a decision, which was to incorporate Instant Run-off Voting (IRV) as the mechanism for the Drop Rule. Bringing the field of candidates from 4 to 1 in the fastest way possible.

Varco ruled this item to be out of order, which it was not and proceeded to a vote challenging the chair, which again failed on an 8-6 vote.

We expect when the same issue is brought up for amendment of the Rules, Varco will again misrepresent the truth and say he believes the item is out of order and in violation of the DFL Constitution and Robert’s Rules of Order (Newly Revised). It is not. A convention can set their own rules any way they want, using IRV to winnow the field is a reasonable and rational approach, and the DFL Party supports the use of preferential voting methods and states:

Minnesota Democratic Farmer-Labor Party Ongoing Platform.

We support:

Government Accountability to the Public

The use of ranked choice voting, also known as instant run-off voting for, state and local elections.

For the record, using IRV as the Drop Rule doesn’t even mean, IRV is determining the endorsement, it just sets the field.

Thao Affair May Be Poised for Resolution

St Paul City Council member Dai Thao’s (DFL-Ward 1) hit a deep trench Saturday of the second Ward Conventions when questions were raised by KMSP reporter Tom Lyden about where-or-not Thao is a transactional elected official, meaning it’s pay-to-play, and whether his campaign had solicited contributions illegally. His campaign manager Angela Marlowe was informed by Lyden of a press release from the Thao campaign which fired her from her position.

Since she was virtually thrown under the bus by Thao, Marlowe felt no loyalty and was quick to speak with authorities about her involvement where they requested her technology used for communication with others. She relinquished her cell phone and pad for their scrutiny. We understand earlier this week her devices were returned and impressions were conveyed there would be no further inquiries into this matter.

We are unclear as to when the final report will be offered, but will not be surprised because of the specter which hangs over Thao coming into the DFL City Convention, it may occur next week. If as it seems, Thao is cleared of wrongdoing, his campaign will have a clear conscience, but the question over who did the damage is still in question.

We have heard lobbyist Sarah Clarke shared the original text messages she received with others and record of the conversations exist on other person’s devices. As we have said before most people are either fairly or unfairly pointing fingers at former Council Member Melvin Carter III’s (DFL-Ward 1) campaign.

Now, this can just be an outgrowth of Ward 1 politics, or it might be an aspect of citywide/mayoral politics. We know for sure a portion of this issue will likely play out next weekend.

The City DFL Rules Fight Headed for the Floor

When the St Paul City Council member Dai Thao’s (DFL-Ward 1) and the former City Council member Pat Harris’ (DFL-Ward 3) supporters on the St Paul City DFL Rules Committee colluded together to set the rules to prevent an endorsement, they may have over-played their hands. If the former Council Member Melvin Carter III (DFL-Ward 1) campaign’s response is also too great they may overplay their hand as well.

Without the Thao/Harris collusion, the convention was poised for no endorsement. Honestly, 10 % limit not imposed until the 3rd ballot, along with a four-ballot limit, and combined with a 5:00 PM time certain end, almost assuredly means, three candidates in the final ballot and no endorsement.  Logic would dictate, because of Ranked Choice Voting being the reality in November, there is no clear reason why any candidate will leave the race. The St Paul DFL City Party is effectively neutered and has little force of will. Since everyone who wants to be, is in the boat in November, there is no incentive for anyone to drop out.

In a traditional DFL endorsement, where there are two candidates in November after the Primary, a DFL endorsement likely produced the Primary winner and the eventual elected official. This year, this is not the case.

This reality sets the stage for the Carter campaign to over-reach. If they propose and have more than 50 +1 of the delegates, they can deploy any system they so choose, but it is not advisable. If they want a legitimate contest they should propose the fastest route—which ironically is Instant run-off voting—to a two-candidate competition and then fix the number of ballots, after that point to five. If Carter campaign tries to go old school and force the endorsement by attrition, they run the risk of seeming heavy-handed, alienating specific voters blocks in November.

The Carter forces need to appear to be a hybrid of sorts. They must appear to be fresh and new, communicating innovative ideas while at the same time having the depth of experiment their candidate brings to the table. We suggest Carter forgo listening to tradition DFL activists like Beth Commers, who if she proposes going to unlimited ballots, it is hypocritical since last city convention she supported limited ballots.

Again, the DFL should try to seem consistent in this election which is completely and totally inconsistent.    

Protest Scheduled for Humphrey Day Dinner

Tomorrow, prior to the Humphrey/Mondale Dinner a Governor’s Reception is scheduled for 3:30-4:30 PM at the Minneapolis Convention Center. We understand the faith-based organization ISAIAH is planning to protest the entire event including the dinner with keynote speaker US Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL). We are hearing Duckworth will only attend if US Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) attends.

All the announced DFL candidates for governor Rep Tim Walz (D-01MN), State Auditor Rebecca Otto (DFL), Rep. Tina Liebling (DFL-26A, Rochester), and Rep Erin Murphy (DFL-64A, St Paul) all will not be attending the gathering. St Paul Mayor Chris Coleman (DFL) was already not attending due to a family conflict. Liebling intends to join the protest.

The reason for the protest is opposition to Governor Mark Dayton’s (DFL) signature on the legislation containing the provision denying the Commissioner of Transportation to allow driver’s licenses for undocumented immigrants.

The increased attention Dayton will receive should create a great deal of discomfort. He always seems uncomfortable in large groups and is often awkward at times. There has been speculation about whether he could be on the autism spectrum and identified as having Asperger’s Syndrome.

In addition to the gubernatorial candidates boycotting the dinner Attorney General Candidate Rep John Lesch (DFL-66B, St Paul) is also forgoing the dinner, but has asked that the money he paid for his table be used to assist in training political organizers in new immigrant communities.

Estrangement in the Executive Branch

We also hear the Governor’s office is becoming more isolationist. Lt Governor Tina Flint Smith (DFL) now has something in common with former Lt Governor Yvonne Pretner-Solon (DFL), as we understand she is not being kept in the loop with the decisions Dayton makes.

During this legislative session, it became quite evident the governor’s legislative staff was sight unseen. They also appear to circle the wagons and huddle with themselves and create an echo chamber on the west side of the Capitol in which the only interests served are the bootlickers who are angling to get the ear of the governor. While, Dayton continues to insulate himself against himself, which is foolish. He only proves his ineffectiveness at each instance

No Need for 2nd Session This Biennium

We would not be surprised if Republicans come back to St Paul in 2018 and decide to head back home right away. Since, they got nearly everything they wanted in 2017, they could save taxpayers money and show how unnecessary a two-year biennial session can be.

Because Governor Mark Dayton’s (DFL) folded like a tent in all the negotiations there may be little left on the Republican agenda other than social issues, but drawing attention to the points of controversy like gun rights, abortion, or restrictions on public services can wait until 2019.

Former State Senator Seeking 1st Congressional Seat

Former Sen. Vicki Jensen (DFL-Owatonna) is preparing her bid to succeed current Congressman Tim Walz (DFL-01MN) and head to Washington DC. During her last election, she had the luxury of support from both the labor unions and the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce.

We expect Jensen will be a formidable candidate and after a loss in the era of Trump, she have plenty of ammunition to use in this forthcoming election.

Governor Dayton Fails to Deliver

The frustration Governor Mark Dayton (DFL) expressed about the legislation he faced, the and exasperation he felt, is feckless, because he didn’t do anything to reflect his sentiments. The vetoing of legislative salaries is an ineffective and veritably useless response. The use of a pocket veto, is a cowardly act, political in nature because it allows legislation to go into effect without an executive signature. It is directly opposite what it appears to be, a veto.

If the Governor sought to accomplish anything it was only through vetoing the tax bill. If the Department of Revenue was defunded, then he needed to veto all the spending bills and force the Republicans back to the table. The major problems he highlights are not responded to in any way, he just kvetches about them.

Here are Dayton’s biggest gripes:

  • Cancellation of the Estate Tax
  • Removal of the automatic inflater on the Tobacco Tax
  • Reduction in Commercial and Industrial Property Tax
  • Prevention of the Commissioner of Public Safety from allowing driver’s licenses for undocumented immigrants
  • An alternative teacher’s licensing procedure

When we discussed the stamina of Dayton as an X factor, we may have hit the mark. Yes, it is a tiring exercise to respond the innovative approaches Republicans to governance. It is not new information to realize Republicans are anti-government. To faint false surprise that the GOP has a drastically different view of the world should come as no surprise at all.

When the governor stands at the podium, wrings his hands at the mess that has been wrought, he might as well be playing with a fidget spinner, because he effectively does nothing, and he fails the citizens of the state.

Sure, Republicans held back legislation from public view until the last minute, because their tactic is to hide the ball, for as long as possible, bring items up in the dark of night and place rotten Easter Eggs in the legislation that appears after, all is said and done.

The final budget signed into law leaves Dayton with a haunting legacy and proves the ineffectiveness of his office to recognize the political reality of Republican control. Thanks for nothing Governor Dayton.

Dayton’s Veto Gives Republicans Political Cover on Salary Increase

As the debate over legislative salaries continues, Governor Mark Dayton (DFL) in a futile attempt, to try and respond to the Republican budget, he may have provided political cover for Republican legislators by letting the courts force the issue. Constitutionally, the first item funded is the legislative branch, and legislative salaries are included in the funding.

Through his veto, Dayton has set the stage for a court battle which Republicans can win by fighting for the independence of the legislative branch and the financial means to maintain said independence. As we have already heard from Senate Majority Leader Paul Gazelka (R-13, Nisswa) the issue is a separation of powers. We had expected the legislature would ultimately win this through the courts and be forced to accept their pay increase, and House Republicans could faint their opposition to more money while cashing their checks. Instead, Dayton serves it up on a silver platter.

St Paul City DFL Rules Committee Creates Rules for No Endorsement

We attended last night’s meeting of the Rules Committee of the St Paul City DFL and can conclude the proposed rules are merely the result of collusion between the Dai Thao campaign and the Pat Harris campaign structured to forgo an endorsement at the city convention on June 17th. As we have said before the existence of Ranked Choice Voting in November Devalues the DFL Endorsement and the campaigns have responded in turn.

There were four specific maneuvers which impinge the endorsement. 1) a limit of the balloting to four ballots, 2) a casual drop rule applied after the 2nd ballot of 10%, 3) a 5:00 pm deadline for the convention to end, and 4) a movement of the school board endorsement ahead of the mayoral endorsement.

In the committee, the three campaigns of Thao, Harris and Melvin Carter III were about equally represented, but the Thao and Harris campaigns had a shared mutual interest in there being No Endorsement and voted on the proposed provisions as such. One glaring reality is to see upgraded alternate Darren Tolbolt, the former St Paul City DFL Chair, now a Harris supporter, voting in favor of these rules. By his acts alone, he undermined the DFL endorsement process, one which his former position is charged to defend.

Each of these rules hampers the endorsement from occurring. The ballot limit is a tried and true way to prevent an endorsement because it is often through sheer will the endorsement occurs and when the process allows fatigue and the upgrading of alternates, more movement can occur, but a restriction of ballot prevents this natural progression. Secondly, because of the number used it provides an opportunity for three candidates to be on the 4th ballot. This means no candidate walks away with a loss. The 5:00 PM deadline, appears to be an appeal to cultural sensitivity, which is something the convention organizers failed to do because the date falls on Ramadan, and members of the Somali Community seek a reasonable endpoint to the proceedings to be able to break their fast. Finally, the one way to hold people at a convention is by holding the biggest contest first. This is clearly an endorsement focused on the mayor’s race.

We did hear one novel idea, which was to use Instant Runoff Voting as a drop rule and means to use one ballot to winnow the field down to two candidates, prior to a head-to-head contest. We understand this will be included in a minority report to the convention.

We congratulate the Thao and Harris campaigns for their blatant maneuvers to assure if they don’t get the endorsement no one will. The rules passed on an 8-6 vote.

How Dayton Can Save the 2017-18 Session

Earlier in the legislative session, in an article entitled: Legislative X Factor: Dayton’s Stamina, we discussed Governor Mark Dayton’s (DFL) role akin to his time in college as a goalie, and said, “you can never win the game, but you can prevent your team from losing,” but it appears we may be wrong. At this moment, at this time, Dayton can actually win triumphantly.

The legislation passed by both Republican controlled houses has sent to Dayton, a series of legislation, which limits the spending in state government in nearly all areas. This continues the spending restrictions, base level funding cuts, and slow growth tactics employed by the GOP. By starving government on the vine, they create a self-fulfilling prophecy, that government doesn’t work.

In response, Dayton now has all the tools at his disposal, especially the veto pen. He has nine spending bills, the tax bill, the bonding bill and the preemption bill. He stated early on he would veto the preemption bill; HF004 Labor standards, pensions, local government, and other employment provisions modified, and money appropriated, authored by Rep Pat Garofalo (R-58B, Farmington), because of its restrictions on local control on wages and labor rules. This is ironic for Republicans, who often tout local control as their mantra, to effectively, assert the will of the state creating state control. Last, we knew that was considered Communism.

If Dayton were to also veto the tax bill he could hamstring the effectiveness of the Republicans and protect the state from pending federal tax cuts, fostered by Republicans in control in Washington, DC. This will allow the state to continue to collect revenues based on current tax policy, meaning our state should continue to have surpluses.

Some may believe this is in violation of the agreement on the Special Session, which was extended by a handshake, but as we understand it, that was only on the spending provisions, and just as was the case in 2011, a veto of the tax bill, keeps the ship of state afloat.

If Dayton signs the other spending bills, then the state will avoid the need for another Special Session, because the government is fully funded. Of course, there is one other possibility to send a message to the Republicans and show who has the final say, and that is in the bonding bill. Since Dayton had to renegotiate the buffer strips in the Ag bill, he should line item bonding projects in Republican districts, which are not associated with clean water, water treatment facilities or other environmental projects. Which will reduce the cost of the 2017 bonding bill, and allows the 2018 bonding bill to grow accordingly.

We understand Senate Minority Leader Tom Bakk (DFL-03, Cook) is in favor of a veto of the transportation bill because it is reliant on too much upfront spending taken from the current surplus and the general fund, but that would trigger the need for a Special Session.

So, the basic point is veto preemption, the tax bill, and portions of the bonding bill.

If Legislators Play Politics on FGM Young Women Die, No Time for Politics

Last night, we attended a forum with members of the Somali community at the Grandview Restaurant and Wedding Hall in South Minneapolis. The topic was Female Genital Mutilation (FGM), which is sometimes called incorrectly called female circumcision, because the procedure isn’t done for any preemptive, or positive health reasons, as is male circumcision, but rather to remove a woman’s sexual organs that provide pleasure. This is the epitome of a patriarchy and oppression of women by the male segment of a society. In western eyes, the act is nothing short of barbaric and it is banned in most of the world’s civilized nations.

This clash of cultures recently came to light when two, young Somali girls were taken from Minnesota to Michigan where the procedure was conducted. In Minnesota, it is a crime for a person to perform the procedure, but there is no consequence for the family members who allow it to be done. This is where the public outcry and the conflict between old world ways and the new world of America come front and center.

The principal organizers were: Farhio Khalif, A Voice of East African Women, Fadumo Abdinur, Tasho Community, Omar Jamal, Osman Omar, Waris Mohamud, Hareda Sidow, Deqa Hussen, Camila Abdidoon, and Imam Roble. The most notable absence was freshman Rep. Ilhan Omar (DFL-60B, Minneapolis), the only Somali state legislator.

The guise used to justify FGM is religion, and the battle occurs both inside the family as well as outside in the greater society. The question is will the Somali Community submit to the social standard of their new home or retain the archaic practices of the past.

The person at the forefront of this issue is an unexpected advocate Rep. Mary Franson (R-08B, Alexandria). She made headlines when she compared people on food assistance to wild animals. Her bill is HF2621, and she attended last night’s forum, the companion is SF2355, authored by Sen. Karin Housley (R-39, St Mary’s Point), who did not attend. An alternative position is being advanced in the senate and hampered by Sen. Jim Abeler (R-35, Anoka). He appears to be siding with other members of the Somali community expressing saying the state of Minnesota will take away the children of parents who have allowed this procedure to be performed on their daughters.

He also did not attend the forum and merely phoned it in. Literally, he called during the event and one of the organizers Omar Jamal had his phone turned toward the speaker and informed the Senator many Somali women would be marching on the Capitol and coming to his office to put the issue right.

As these two sides square off it should be explained the biggest issue front and center should not be about the culture clash between old and new it should be the welfare of the children at risk. The procedure is not medically sound, has major, long-term medical consequences and is perpetuated because of ignorance and oppression.

A way to put this issue in another light, we think people should see similarities between this issue and sexual abuse in the Catholic Church. Since FGM is perpetrated under the auspices of religion and remains in the shadows it is akin to the tacit support expressed by the Roman Catholic Church as it shuttled offending clergy around the nation to other parishes when they were found to have abused children.

When it is the institution people turn to in times of solace, the place where the seek comfort in hours of need that authorizes or even administers the horrendous act, the pain felt is even greater. If there are no safe harbors for girls in this new land, then the horrors of the place their parents left enter into their lives for no valid reason.

Why Are Republicans So Mean Spirited?

What is it that constitutes the Republican anti-government fervor? Is it a commitment to a higher-minded purpose, no. Is it a moral construct, maybe? Most likely it is a dogmatic dedication to disdain, an outright rejection of the concept of a collective, societal purpose. The need for others to help make one whole. The realization of the fact, everyone needs something more than they already have.

If a Republican reads this, they will reject it out-of-hand. They will not be able to relate to the notion because it is foreign.

When Hillary Clinton (D) wrote her book, It Takes a Village: And Other Lessons Children Teach Us, she embodied an idea, which was wholly objectionable to a Republican, because extended the concept of who matters in the raising of a child out to those people who might not play a day-to-day role in that child’s rearing. Those people who exemplify the surroundings built to establish the community in which the child is born into are as important as the central family.

In American, 3-5% of the population have sociopathic personalities. We would be willing to bet most if not all vote Republican. If these figures are applied to the MN House it means between 4-6 of the members in this body may be sociopaths and 2-3 members in the Senate. It also begs the question which ones could they be?

As the budget negotiations continue could this idea be a factor in the discussion?

Right now, Speaker Kurt Daudt (R-31A, Crown) is quicker to point fingers after each negotiating session. It may be because he is balancing all his decisions against his gubernatorial bid. We expect a portion of the issue is Daudt has more experience negotiating with Governor Mark Dayton (DFL). Unlike, Senate Majority Leader Paul Gazelka (R-09, Nisswa).

We still hold to our belief we had at the start of the session, there will be a special session and mainly because the House is more strident, may contain more sociopaths and is up for election in 2018.

Debating Science Versus Stupidity

Watching the debate on the House Floor on SF550 is an interesting exercise, akin to watching your favorite sports team being beaten by your biggest rival. We listened to Rep. Glenn Gruenhagen (R-18B, Glencoe) address his colleagues on the topic of climate change. He sincerely voiced his disbelief in the support by 97% of scientists acknowledging the existence of human influence on climate change. As he spoke it was hard not to shout, out words like blooming idiot, imbecile, and an abject fool.

It is clear the residents of district 18B, may not be any more intelligent than their representative because they have sent him to St Paul four times. As an insurance man, Gruenhagen provides his customers with protection against calamities and misfortunes. We only wish he would do the same to viewers of the session unless his intent is to provide comedic relief, but we learned long ago it is not polite to tease the mentally challenged.

The Legislative X Factor: Dayton’s Stamina

In college, Mark Dayton (DFL) was a goalie and he should have learned you can never win a game, but you can prevent your team from losing. Right now he is the only person between the direction Republicans want to take our state and where we are at this moment. It’s showdown time.

DFL legislators are forestalled and disheartened every time the Governor talks to reporters when he undermines negotiations with the Republican-controlled legislature. A perfect example is his most recent statement about accepting the Republican Transportation plan to use one-time money to pay for a portion of the projects. This is like playing poker and showing your opponent your hands while they hold theirs to the breast. Or a better analogy is playing Russian Roulette and you are the only one who holds the gun to your own head.

The call by House Speaker Kurt Daudt (R-31A, Crown) for Dayton and his commissioners to be at the table while the House and Senate Republicans negotiate between each other is a tactical maneuver. It forces Dayton into a position where he is partially culpable for these proposed cuts. Dayton should hold the line and remain outside of the negotiations until the two Republican sides have agreed. The transportation issues can simply be resolved through a Bonding Bill and if Dayton stands firm then Republicans will come to him, because of internal pressures felt in their caucuses.

The reality is, people need to feel pain for them to seek resolution from their elected leadership. The only way Republicans will move is when the voices of their constituents become too loud to ignore.

Dayton’s legacy is in play he can leave office with a poor 2017-18 Budget and that will be what he is remembered for, or he can stand and fight. He needs to give no quarter, prove his resolve, and draw lines he will not cross. He needs to have staff far more active and visible and they need to speak with one voice. No, that is not acceptable to our Governor. Then he needs to call Republicans out when the mischaracterize, distort, and misguide the public.

Also, if Dayton wants to prove he is looking out for Minnesota’s interests when and if a Special Session ensues, he needs to ignore AFSCME and let state employees experience pain too. Many jobs in Greater Minnesota exist because of government and Republicans need to be reminded of that fact.

Governor Dayton, play like Minnesota Wild, your back is up against the wall, and if you lose one play you lose the game, the series, your playoff hopes and hearts and minds of your supporters.